Manoj Chunnilal Mankar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Water Conservatio

WP3579-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3579/2014 (MANOJ CHUNNILAL MANKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.D. Raut, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri A.D. Sonak, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri A.Y. Kapgate, counsel for the R-2.

Shri G.G. Bade, counsel for the R-3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 3 , 2015.

Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner states on the basis of the pursis filed on behalf of the respondent no.2 that the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur has directed the Zilla Parishad to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. It is stated that since the Zilla Parishad is ready to decide the representation of the petitioner, the cause in the petition, would not survive, at this stage.

The learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad makes a statement that the representation of the petitioner would be decided within a period of two months.

In view of the statement made by the petitioner on the basis of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.2, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. The points raised in the petition are, however, kept open.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE