Chandrakant Shankarrao Deshmukh v. State Of Mah. Thru. Secty. And 5 ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4150/2007 Chandrakant s/o Shankarrao Deshmukh ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Mantralaya, Annex, Fort, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Vaidya, Adv. h/f Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitioner Shri D.P. Thakare, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 Mrs. R.D. Raskar, Advocate for respondent no.5 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 16.01.2017 Shri Vaidya, the learned Counsel holding for Shri Parchure, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the cause for filing the writ petition would not survive in view of the subsequent development. It is stated that the matter between the parties is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the parties would be governed by the final order in the said matter. It is stated that the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the aforesaid.

Hence, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar