Bombay High CourtCAW/1584/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Ku.Mangla Vitthalrao Lanjewar (Maiden Name Sau. Mangle W/O Dnyanendra Meshram) v. Vidarbha Education Society And 5 Others

2016-06-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 caw1584.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.1584/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4804/2003 Ku. Mangla d/o Vitthalrao Lanjewar ..Versus..

Vidarbha Education Society and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 14.6.2016 Heard Smt. S.W. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. H.N. Prabhu, A.G.P. for the respondent No.4. The petitioner seeks review of the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4804/2003.

The judgment shows that it is based on the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties. Smt. S.W. Deshpande, Advocate was not representing the petitioner and the petitioner was represented by Shri V.A. Kothale, Advocate. The petitioner cannot be permitted to come out with new case in review application, not argued at the time when petition was heard. There is no error apparent on record. I see no reason to entertain the present application. The application is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE Tambaskar.