Sanjay Manikrao Barekar v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Mauda, Nagpur And Another

2703apl473.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 473 OF 2016 (Sanjay Manikrao Barekar vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, PS Mauda, Tahsil - Mauda, Dist. - Nagpur & Anr.) _____________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

MARCH 27, 2017.

Heard Shri I.G. Meshram, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri V.A. Thakare, learned APP for respondent No. 1.

2.

The applicant - a Patwari has not only taken note of a registered document but also has deleted encumbrance of Finance Company from the revenue record on the basis of an unregistered document. In this situation, the cognizance of an offence has been taken under Section 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code against him at the instance of that Finance Company and after completing investigation, a charge sheet has also been filed. 3.

In the circumstances, we are not inclined to intervene in the matter in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Leaving all rival conventions open, we dispose of the present application. No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE *GS.