← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3898/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Matin Ahmad Khan Gulam Manzoor Khan v. Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati And Others

2016-07-12Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp3898.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3898 OF 2016 [Matin Ahmad Khan Gulam Manzoor Khan .vs. Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Pravin S. Patil, counsel for the petitioner, Ms. R.V. Kaliya, AGP for respondent no.1.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : JULY 12, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent no.1-Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati to decide the representation of the petitioner within a time frame. It is the case of the petitioner that though the petitioner had opted for his transfer to village Kata, a transfer order is issued in favour of Shri Irfan Ali Kasam Ali transferring him to Kata. It is stated that the petitioner is likely to be transferred to any other place to which the petitioner has not shown his inclination for posting. We would not issue the direction against the respondents, as sought. The petition is premature. The petitioner has not been transferred as yet to any place. It is also not known whether Shri Irfan Ali Kasam Ali had also opted for Kata, where the petitioner desires his posting. In the circumstances of the case, specially when the transfer of the petitioner is not effected, the petitioner should not have any grievance.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande