Sau Anita W/O Premanand Raikwar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Development,Mumbai And 2 Other

1 cp230.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.230 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7248 OF 2014 [D] [Sau. Anita w/o Premanand Raikwar .vs. Rajgopal Devara and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Akshay Sudame, counsel for the petitioner, Shri J.Y. Ghurde, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : AUGUST 02, 2016.

By this contempt petition, the petitioner has sought action against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order directing the respondents to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within one year.

Shri Ghurde, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, states that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the caste claim of the petitioner is decided. It is stated that there is heavy pendency of the caste claims before the scrutiny committee and the delay in deciding the caste claim of the petitioner is not deliberate.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the contempt petition, with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA

2 cp230.16.odt C E R T I F I C A T E "I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order."

Uploaded by : A.S. Gulande, P.A. Uploaded on : 03.08.2016