Bombay High CourtAPPA/455/2016allowed

Smt. Vandana W/O Akhilesh Pandey v. Smt. Abhilash W/O Anil Pandey

2017-07-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 appa455.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 455 OF 2016 (SMT. VANDANA AKHILESH PANDEY....VS.. SMT. ABHILASHA ANIL PANDEY) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.M.Gordey, Senior Advocate a/b. Ms R.D.Raskar, Advocate for Applicant/appellant.

Shri R.R.Vyas, Advocate for Non-applicant/ Respondent. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JULY 28, 2017.

Heard.

For the reasons stated and the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, the original complainant is granted leave to file appeal to challenge the judgment by which the complaint filed by her under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is dismissed and the accused is acquitted. The appeal be registered.

Shri R.R. Vyas, advocate states that he will continue to represent the respondent/ accused, therefore, fresh notice is not required.

Call R & P.

JUDGE RRaut..