← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5623/2018dismissed

Roopchand S/O Kashiram Pudke Thr. P.O.A. Subhash Roopchand Pudke v. Shamlal Mannu Pashine Through His P.O.A. Rajesh Shamlal Pashine And Others

2023-06-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

22wp5623-2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR PURSIS STAMP NO.03 OF 2018 IN Writ Petition No.5623 of 2018 ROOPCHAND S/O KASHIRAM PUDKE THR. P.O.A. SUBHASH ROOPCHAND PUDKE VS SHAMLAL MANNU PASHINE THROUGH HIS P.O.A. RAJESH SHAMLAL PASHINE AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri H.S. Chawhan, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Nitin Vyawahare, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1(a) and (1(b) CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATE : 07.06.2023 1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a pursis dated 07.06.2023, informing that his client had taken back case papers in the year 2021.

2.

Accordingly, Shri H.S. Chawhan, Shri P.S. Chawhan, R.S. Khalangiwale and P.K. Mohta are hereby discharged. Writ Petition No.5623 of 2018 3.

From the pursis dated 07.06.2023 filed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the case papers were taken back by the petitioner long back in the year 2021 and since then he has not engaged any lawyer in the matter of his choice to represent him. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition. 4.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

nd.thawre

22wp5623-2018.odt 5.

It is made clear that in case, any application is filed for restoration, the office should not accept the same unless the petitioner submits a receipt of Rs.10,000/- deposited with High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur, as cost. [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] DOMAJI THAWRE 16:18 nd.thawre