Shubhangi Kashyap Sawarkar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Rural Development Dept. Mumbai And Another
1 wp3361.18+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3361/2018 (Sonali W/o Liladhar Sonavane vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3362/2018 (Ranjana Tukaram Pise vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3363/2018 (Vitthal Ajabrao Kothe vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3364/2018 (Seema Ravindra Funde vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3365/2018 (Sujata W/o Dilip Ghode vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3368/2018 (Roshana Satish Karmarkar vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3740/2018 (Sau. Usha Raju Sagare vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3741/2018 (Moreshwar Pandurang Tupe vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3742/2018 (Kavita Chandrakant Meshram vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.)
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3743/2018 (Shubhangi Kashyap Sawarkar vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the petitioners in all petitions Shri A.S. Fulzele, Addl. GP for the respondent no. 1 in all petitions CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ.
DATED : 06 /08/2018 1.
Nobody for respondent No.2 - Zilla Parishad. Learned Addl.G.P. appears for respondent No.1. Learned Addl. G.P. submits that contest is between Zilla
2 wp3361.18+ Parishad and petitioners.
2.
Advocate Kshirsagar submits that identical controversy is decided on 3rd July, 2018 by this Court. He has produced copy of that order passed in Writ Petition No.2528/2018 and connected matters for our perusal and it is taken on record as "Exh.A". 3.
Petitioners have joined at transferred places and request is for consideration of their representation for suitable posting to bring husband and wife at least within radius of 30 kilometers.
4.
Above mentioned Writ Petition No.2528/2018 and three matters are disposed of on 3rd July, 2018 by us with necessary directions.
5.
Hence, we direct respondent No.2 - Zilla Parishad to consider placement of petitioners or their spouse at a place within 30 kilometers of each other so as to reconcile with the distance norm stipulated in Government Resolution dated 27.2.2017.
6.
We direct petitioners / their spouse to make representation pointing out vacancies accordingly within 15 days from today.
7.
If such representation is made, it shall be decided by Chief Executive Officer within next six weeks.
3 wp3361.18+ 8.
With these directions and keeping all contentions open, we dispose of writ petitions. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Ansari