← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPR/126/2021allowed

Afsha Irshad Khan And Another v. Irshad S/O Akil Ahmad Khan And 3 Others

2021-12-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

appr126.21 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.126/2021 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST.NO.6422/2021 Afsha Irshad Khan and anr ..vs..

Irshad s/o Akil Ahmad Khan and ors ................................................................................................................................................................... OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri Abdul Subhan, Counsel for Applicants.

Shri S.S.Baggha, Adv. h/f Shri Amit Khare, Counsel for NA Nos.1 to 4.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : DECEMBER , 2021 .

1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing a criminal revision application.

3.

Learned counsel Shri Abdul Subhan, appears for applicants, who are, wife and a minor son of non-applicant No.1 Irshad.

4.

Two criminal appeals arose from proceedings filed by applicant. Those two criminal appeals were decided by learned Judge of Lower Appellate Court. Appeal filed by Irshad, non-applicant No.1/husband herein, was dismissed. Whereas, appeal filed by applicant No.1, who is wife of Irshad, non-applicant No.1, was also dismissed. 5.

Irshad, non-applicant No.1/husband, approached to this Court by filing a revision. The revision was barred by limitation. Therefore, an application for .....2/-

appr126.21 2 condonation of delay was filed. The said application was allowed on 17.9.2021 by this Court (Coram : Rohit B.Deo, J.) and the revision filed by the husband is now duly registered.

6.

The wife also preferred a revision. It was also barred by limitation. Therefore, she also filed an application for condonation of delay.

7.

It appears that on 17.9.2021 when the application for condonation of delay was allowed, which was filed by Irshad, non-applicant No.1/husband, the application filed by the wife was dismissed with a liberty to her to file an appropriate application. Accordingly, the present application is filed by the wife.

8.

Since the revision filed by Irshad, non-applicant No.1/husband, is already pending, in my view, an opportunity will have to be given to the wife also. Therefore, though there is an objection on the part of learned counsel for non-applicants, I am of view that in the interest of justice, the application needs to be allowed. 9.

Hence, the criminal application for condonation of delay is allowed. The delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to register the revision and tag the same with Criminal Revision Application No.71/2021 which is filed by Irshad, non-applicant No.1/husband.

With this, the criminal application stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Digitally signed by BHUSHAN RANA WANKHEDE Date:

2021.12.06 17:12:16 +0530 !! BRW !!

BHUSHAN RANA WANKHEDE ...../-