Mohd. Afsarmiya Bapumiya Deshmukh And Others v. Sharifkhan Noorkhan Musalman And Others

12.02..cas.666.15+

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (s) NO. 666/205 & 667/2015 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 262/2001 (Mohd. Afsarmiya Bapumiya Deshmukh and others vs. Sharifkhan Musalman and others ) ................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................ Mr. Mahalle, Adv.for appellants CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J.

DATED : 12th February, 2016.

Office report shows that notices have been served in Civil Application Nos. 666 and 667 both of 2015. However, there is no appearance for the contesting respondents.

Mr. Mahalle, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the reasons for delay of 45 days have been stated in para nos. 3 and 4 of the Application. I am satisfied that sufficient grounds have been made out for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of.

C.A.(S)NO.667/2015:

Civil Application for bringing LRs of respondent no. 3 on record, is allowed, in terms of prayer clause (i) of the Application.

Amendment be carried out within two weeks.

JUDGE sahare