Smt. Smruti Wd/O. Prashant Sakharkar v. The Chairman, Nagpur Improvement Trust And Others

928wp 4860.2022 +.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4860/2022 Shri Amol s/o Krishnarao Bhadke and anr. ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. AND WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4861/2022 Shri Sunil s/o Chinduji Khandale ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. AND WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4862/2022 Smt. Smruti wd/o Prashant Sakharkar ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. AND WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4863/2022 Sau. Kantabai Yadavrao Sakharkar ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. AND WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4864/2022 Smt. Asha w/o Deochand Karemore ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. AND WRIT PETITION (WP) NO. 4865/2022 Shri Rahul s/o Yadavrao Sakharkar ..VS.. The Chairman, N.I.T. and ors. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court'

s or Judge'

s Order Coram, appearances, Court'

s Orders or directions and Registrar'

s order__________________________________________________________ Shri S.S. Sitani, Advocate for petitioners in all WPs Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for respondents/N.I.T. in all WPs CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.J. DATED : 12/08/2022 In Writ Petition No. 4860/2022 the petitioners pray that the representations dated 28.06.2022 made by them for issuance of release letter be considered in accordance with law and a decision thereon be taken. When this writ petition was heard, it was submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that there were other similar writ petitions that were filed making identical prayers. Hence all these writ petitions (Writ Petition Nos. 4861/2022, 4862/2022, 4863/2022, 4864/2022 and 4865/2022) which are not on Board are taken on Board and are heard together. SMGate

928wp 4860.2022 +.odt Shri S.M. Puranik, learned Counsel for the respondents/NIT who is present in Court accepts notice for the respondents/NIT. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Considering the fact that the petitioners seek a direction for consideration of the representations/applications made by them, it is directed that the respondent no. 2 shall examine the respective applications/representations made by each petitioner and take a decision thereon in accordance with law subject to all necessary documents being supplied by the respective petitioners, within a period of four weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) Digitally signed by SANDIP MAHADEV GATE Date:

2022.08.17 10:41:21 +0530 SANDIP MAHADEV GATE SMGate