Bombay High CourtWP/4603/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Jairam S/O Laxmanrao Mahakalkar v. State Of Maha. Ministry Of Revenue Mumbai Thr. Secretary

2016-11-29Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

1/2 wp4603.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4603 OF 2016 Jairam Laxmanrao Mahakalkar -vsState of Maharashtra, Ministry of Revenue and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. S.S.Sharma, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. I.J.Damle, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5. Mr. G.A.Kunte, counsel for the respondent No.4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 29.11.2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 to correct the city survey record as per the layout map of Nagpur Improvement Trust and to prepare the correct property card/akhivpatrika in respect of the plot of the petitioner.

Shri Damle, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 and Shri Kunte, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4, state that an enquiry is being conducted in respect of 2000 plots in Nandanvan Layout/Wathoda Street Scheme and the property cards/akhivpatrikas would be prepared after the preparation of the map. It is stated that the petitioner would also be heard as per his turn and appropriate orders would be passed in respect of the petitioner before the process is completed. Since then enquiry is being conducted in respect of the plots in Nandanvan Layout/Wathoda Street Scheme in view of the order of the District Superintendent of Land Records, Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, at this stage, in view of the assurance given

2/2 wp4603.16 by the respondents that the petitioner's case would also be considered and an appropriate decision would be passed in the matter before the completion of the process.

By accepting the statements made on behalf of the respondents that would be binding on the respondents, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE