M/S. Vaibhav Laxmi Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Chairman Prashant Natthuji Shende v. The State Of Maharashtra (Thr. P.S.O. Sitabuldi, Nagpur) And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.556/2016 M/s. Vaibhav Laxmi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., through its Chairman ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, (Through P.S.O. Sitabuldi Nagpur) Presently investigation entrusted to Crime Branch (EOW), Nagpur City and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri K.C. Deogade, Counsel for petitioner Shri A.S. Fulzele, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri N.B. Kirtane, Counsel for respondent no.2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATE : 11/01/2018 The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner was not responding to the Counsel and was not giving any instructions, the Counsel has served a notice on the petitioner that the Counsel would not appear for the petitioner and would withdraw the Vakalatnama. It is stated that in the aforesaid set of facts, the appearance of the Counsel for the petitioner should be discharged. In the circumstances of the case, the Counsel wishes to withdraw the Vakalatnama. It is apparent from the statements made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the criminal writ petition. Hence, the criminal writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar