Aditya S/O Devendra Dapurkar, Minor Thorugh His Father Guardina, Shri Devendra Dapurkar v. The Commissioner Of State Common Entrance Test Cell (Cet), Mumbai And 2 Others
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4139/2016 (Aditya s/o Devendra Dapurkar :through his father vs. The Commissioner of State Common Entrance Test Cell and others ) .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. N.R.Saboo, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs.Bharati Dangre, Government Pleaders for Respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A.NAIK & MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 20th July, 2016 Heard.
By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to confirm the registration of his application for admission to first year of Undergraduate Technical Course in Engineering and Technology for the academic year 2016-17. A declaration is sought by the petitioner that the petitioner would be entitled to admission in the 3rd and 4th rounds of Centralised Admission process (CAP).
Mrs. Bharati Dangre, the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3 states on instructions, that the petitioner could not be considered for the first and second CAP rounds for admission to the Undergraduate technical course in Engineering as, unfortunately the results of HSSC examination of
the petitioner was not declared till the commencement of 1st round of CAP. It is submitted that the 4th round of CAP is scheduled on 21st July 2016 and it is likely to be rescheduled. It is stated that the name of the petitioner for admission to an Engineering College of his choice would be considered in the 4th round, as per his merit. In view of the statement made by the learned Government Pleader, the grievance of the petitioner should stand redressed.
Hence, by accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, that would be binding on them, we dispose of the Writ Petition, with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE sahare
C E R T I F I C A T E "
and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order." Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.
Uploaded on: 21.07.2016.