Ramkrushna S/O Narsing Chavhan v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Collector, Yavatmal And Others

2024:BHC-NAG:8748 15=CAO 952-24 in MCAst 13314-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 952 OF 2024 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 13314 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 5324 OF 2023 (D) RAMKRUSHNA S/O. NARSING CHAVHAN -Vs. - THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Ms. Mallika Babhulkar, Advocate h/f. Shri S.V. Ingole, Advocate for appellant.

Shri M.A. Kadu, AGP for respondents/State.

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH , J.

DATED : 07/08/ This is an application for condonation of delay of 338 days caused in preferring the application for restoration of appeal.

2.

Perused the application.

3.

Heard learned Advocates for both sides.

4.

Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. 5.

Registry is directed to register the restoration application.

15=CAO 952-24 in MCAst 13314-24.odt 6.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.

13314 OF 2024 This is an application for restoration of appeal. 2.

Perused the application.

3.

Heard learned Advocates for both sides.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed, subject to condition that the applicant shall remove the office objection within a period of two weeks. If the office objection does not remove within two weeks, the application shall be deemed to be dismissed without further orders.

5.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) B.T. Khapekar