← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/2050/2014rejected at admission stage

Sau. Jayashri W/O Jayendra @ Balu Patil And 3 Others v. Smt. Vandana Prakash Bhagat And 2 Others

2016-08-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq3 pages

1 caf2049.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.F. NO.2049/2014 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.14679/2014 Sau. Jayashri W/o Jayendra @ Balu Patil and others ..VS..

Smt. Vandana Prakash Bhagat and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri H.R. Dhumale, Advocate for the applicants/appellants. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : 22.8.2016.

Office note shows that the matter is dismissed against the non-applicant No.1 because of default on the part of the applicants in serving her. The non-applicant Nos.2 and 3 are minors represented by non-applicant No.1. The effect of dismissal of proceedings against the non-applicant No.1 is that the proceedings are dismissed against non-applicant Nos.2 and 3 also.

The Advocate for the applicants has filed Pursis Stamp No.5259/2010 stating that the applicants are not giving instructions and are not responding to his correspondence.

The application is dismissed for want of

2 caf2049.14 prosecution. No costs.

In view of dismissal of Civil Application (C.A.F.) No.2049/2014, the First Appeal Stamp No.14679/2014 and Civil Application (C.A.F.) No.2050/2014 are also rejected. JUDGE Tambaskar.

3 caf2049.14 CERTIFICATE original signed Judgment/Order".

Uploaded By : N.V. Tambaskar.

Uploaded On : 23.8.2016.

Personal Assistant.