← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/680/2020disposed off

Ansh S/O Surendra Mahakalkar, Thr Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Madhuri W/O Surendra Mahakalkar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Wardha City, Wardha, Dist. Wardha, And Another

2021-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit B. Borkar1 pages

40.Cr.W.P. No.680.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.680/2020 Ansh S/o. Surendra Mahakalkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders or directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C. G. Barapatre, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri V. A. Thakare, A.P.P. for Respondents/State. CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 01/09/2021.

1.

Heard Shri C. G. Barapatre, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Shri V. A. Thakare, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents/State submitted that State has filed reply and in paragraph No.3 of the said reply it is stated that in view of expert's opinion the Investigating Agency has prepared 'B' final report.

3.

The learned Court before which the said 'B' final report will be filed, shall not accept the same unless and until the petitioner who is the complainant is heard. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, it will be open for the learned Magistrate either to accept or reject the 'B' final report.

4.

With this observations, writ petition is disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE RGurnule