← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1123/2018ca disposed off

Dhanraj Bharat Shirbansari And Another v. Shriram Ramratan Shripatre And Others

2024-06-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Anandrao Deshmukh2 pages

cao730.17.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.

IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.607 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.

(Dhanraj Bharat Shribansari and another Vs. Shriram Ramratan Shripatre and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Anup D. Dangore, Advocate for Appellant.

Mr. L. S. Dadmal, Advocate for Respondent No.7(a). CORAM: SANJAY A. DESHMUKH , J.

DATE: 18 th JUNE, .

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.1121/2018:

Heard.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay as well as setting aside abatement in filing bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6 and No.7 on record. 3.

There is a delay of 10 years caused in filing an application for setting aside abatement in bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6 and No.7.

4.

Learned Advocate for the respondent has strongly objected the application.

5.

After going through the contents of the application, I am satisfied that a sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Considering the delay of 10 years

cao730.17.O.odt caused and more particularly it would be proper to direct the appellant to pay costs of Rs.3000/- to be deposited with the High Court Bar Library, Nagpur and Rs.1000/- to be paid to the respondent within a period of two weeks, subject to payment of costs, the application is allowed and disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.1123/2018:

Heard.

2.

This is an application for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6 and respondent No.7 on record. 3.

Learned Advocate for the respondent has strongly objected the application.

4.

After going through the contents of the application, I am satisfied that a sufficient cause is made out for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent No.6 and respondent No.7 on record.

5.

The legal heirs of respondent No.6 and No.7 as mentioned in paragraph 3 and 4 of the application be brought on record within a period of one week. 6.

The application is allowed and disposed of.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) NSN