Bombay High CourtWP/4172/2007dismissedrule discharged

Sai Chhaya Vidya Prasarak Mandal Thru. Its. President v. State Of Mah. Thru. The Secty. And 3 ORS.

2017-06-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

05.06.wp.4172.07

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4172/ 2007 (Shri Sai Chhaya Vidya Prasarak Mandal vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) ...........................

............................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. None for the petitioner Ms. M.S. Nayak, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1 Ms.Arti Singh, Adv.h/for Mr P.D.Meghe, Adv. for respondent no.3 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

D ATED : 5th June, 2017.

By this Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges the action on the part of the Social Welfare Officer Zilla Parishad, Wardha in appointing the respondent no.4 as a Drawing and Disbursement Officer and granting him administrative and financial powers.

On a reading of the impugned order dated 31.08. 2007, it appears that by the said order, the petitioner was directed to hand over the charge of the Head of the school to the respondent no. 4 as the financial and administrative powers were granted to the respondent no.4 by the said order. Nothing is placed on record to show that a teacher in the school for specially disabled would have a right to retain the financial and administrative powers. It is also informed to this Court by the learned counsel for the no.3-Social Welfare Officer, Zilla Parishad Wardha, that the school in which the petitioner and the respondent no.4 were working, is closed and is not functional from 01.04.2012.

05.06.wp.4172.07 In the aforesaid set of facts, the petition is liable to be dismissed. Hence it is dismissed as such, with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare