M.S.R.T.C. At Vahatuk Bhavan,Dr. Anandrao Nair Marg, Mumbai Office At Yavatmal Thr. Controller, v. Smt. Swati Vijay Bogawar

906.FA.1228.2010.

1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAF) No.28 of 2021 IN First Appeal No.1228 of 2010 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through its Controller, Yavatmal Division Tq. & Distt. Yavatmal Vs. Smt. Swati Wd/o Vijay Bogawar & Ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri S.C. Mehadia, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri S. Sidam, Advocate h/f Shri B.D. Vora, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri R.N. Sen, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATE : 22 nd JANUARY, 2021.

The respondent Nos.1 and 2/original claimants in claim petition under Section 166 seek early hearing. Though, the appeal is of the year 2010, the claim petition was of the year 2004 arising from an accident that was caused on 20/05/2004.

2.

It is stated that respondent No.1 is the widow and respondent No.2 is the daughter of the deceased. It is stated that they were solely dependent on the income of the deceased and they have no other source of income.

3.

Considering the above facts and circumstances, the application is allowed. The matter be listed on final hearing board in the week commencing from 15th February, 2021.

4.

The civil application stands disposed of.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) vijay