← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1455/2017dispossed offdismiss for default

Shakil S/O Hamid Mansuri And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Department Of Urban Development, Mumbai Thr. Principal Secretary And ORS

2017-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

11.7WP.965.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 965 OF 2017.

(Shakil Hamid Mansuri & others .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Mr. A.Y. Kapgate, Advocate for petitioners, Mr. A.V. Palshikar, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Atul Bhawsar, Advocate for respondent no.3, Mr. G.G. Bade, Advocate for respondent no.4.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & ROHIT B. DEO, JJ. DATED : JULY 11, 2017.

In pursuance of orders of this Court dated 23.6.2017, respondent no.3 through its Chief Officer is present with Mr. Atul Bhawsar, Advocate. Respondent no.4 is present with Mr. G.G. Bade, Advocate.

Respondent no.3 has filed reply affidavit. Learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. Bade, learned Advocate are seeking time to file reply.

Mr. A.Y. Kapgate, learned Advocate for petitioners, is opposing the request. He points out that this Court has issued bailable warrant on 23.6.2017.

Respondent no.4 has filed Civil Application No. 1455/17 for recalling that order.

As respondent no.4 has appeared in person and is seeking time to file reply, order dated 23.6.2017 is recalled.

11.7WP.965.17 Civil Application is disposed of.

Respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 are given time of two weeks to file their respective reply.

List accordingly on 25.7.2017.

Interim orders to continue.

Judge Judge J.