Messrs. Jai Bajrang A Proprietary Firm, Through Its Proprietor Dinesh Chandrapal Pankaj v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Secretary, Revenue And Forests Department, Mumbai And 3 Other

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4085/2014 Messrs. Jai Bajrang, A Proprietary Firm through its Proprietor Dinesh Chandrapal Pankaj, Nagpur ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Revenue and Forests Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.V. Samarth, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. B.H. Dangre, G.P. for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 20.03.2015 Heard.

Shri Samarth, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that due to subsequent development, the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is, however, stated that a direction may be issued to the State Government to consider and decide the application filed by the petitioner for refund of the earnest deposit.

On the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition as infructuous. We, however, direct the respondent no.4 to decide the application filed by the petitioner for refund of earnest deposit as early as possible and positively within a period of four weeks. Order accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar