Bombay High CourtWP/4830/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Dipak Motiram Gulhane, Prop. Dipak Kiranma Stores, Washim v. Umabai Wd/O Radhkisan Kabara

2016-02-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

wp.4830.14 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4830 OF 2014 (Dipak Motiram Gulhane vs.

Umabai wd/o Radhkisan Kabara) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms. S.S. Pathak, Adv. h/f Shri Rohit Deo, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Rajeev Chhabra, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM

: Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 3 rd FEBRUARY, 2016.

Shri Rajeev Chhabra, learned Advocate for the respondent-landlord, on instructions, states that the matter is amicably settled and the petitioner has handed over the vacant possession of suit premises to the respondent. Ms. S.S. Pathak, Advocate, holding for Shri Rohit Deo, learned Advocate for the petitioner, submits that she is not having any instructions.

Accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE *sandesh