Hemant S/O Sudhir Channakeshala v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Triabal Development Dept. Mumbai And Others

28.11.CP.232.17

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 232/2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1963/2016 (Hemant s/o sudhir Channakeshala VS. The State of Maharashtra and others ) .......................................................... ............................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. C.V. Sawalkar, Adv. for petitioner Miss N.P. Mehta, AGP for respondents 1 and 2 CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 28th November, 2017.

1.

Though caste claim could not be decided within stipulated time, it is admitted that subsequently there is an adjudication. 2.

Hence, with liberty to petitioner to take such steps as are available to him in the matter and keeping all his contention intact, we extend time till passing of order by Scrutiny Committee and dispose of the Contempt Petition.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare