Dr.Anil Sukhdevrao Dhage Nagpur v. State Of Mah. Mumbai And 3 Others.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1250/2002 Dr. Anil s/o Sukhdevrao Dhage ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Health Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ - Shri U.S. Dupare, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.M. Ukey, APP for respondents - State Shri Rohit Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.5 CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : 13.08.2015 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.) OPERATIVE PART The learned Counsel for the petitioner has tendered a Pursis date 12.8.2015 on record, which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the statements made in the Pursis are acceptable and the petitioner would abide by the same and accordingly comply with the statement made in paragraph no.3.

The learned Counsel for the respondents submit that they have argued the matter and would not like to add anything more.

Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the rival parties, we make the following order.

ORDER

Writ Petition No.1250/2002 is allowed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar