Raju S/O. Hiraman More (In Jail) v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Ramnagar Nagpur
appr119.17 25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.119 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO........ OF 2017 Raju s/o Hiraman More ..vs..
State of Mah., thr. PSO Ramnagar, Chandrapur ....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ....................................................................................................................................................... \ Mrs. S.P. Kulkarni, Counsel appointed for the applicant. Shri V.P. Gangane, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM
: V.M. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 22, 2017.
1.
Heard learned counsel Mrs. S.P. Kulkarni who is appointed by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee at Nagpur to represent the applicant.
2.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision. Delay is of 77 days.
3.
The applicant is convicted, for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, by learned Magistrate at Chandrapur in RCC No.664 of 2008. The appeal carried by the applicant bearing Criminal Appeal No.100 of 2012 was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge at Chandrapur on 25.1.2017. .....2/-
appr119.17 25 4.
The statement is made before this Court that the applicant is in jail.
5.
Statement accepted.
6.
In view of the fact that the applicant is in jail and the present proceedings are filed through the Legal Aid, with the assistance of learned counsel appointed for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, I have gone though the reasons for condonation of delay. Though the application is opposed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am satisfied about the reasons put forth by the applicant. 7.
Hence, the criminal application for condonation of delay is allowed.
8.
Delay caused for preferring the revision is hereby condoned.
9.
Office is directed to register the revision and place the revision before the Court for admission.
10.
Stand over to 26.9.2017.
JUDGE !! BRW !!
...../-