The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through The Regional Manager v. Dr. Narayansingh Kashirasingh Hazari

caf1092.14.O.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (F) NO.1092 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.14847 OF 2012 (The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. thr. Regional Manager, Nagpur Vs. Dr. Narayansingh Kashirasingh Hazari and others) AND FIRST APPEAL NO.613 OF 2012 (Dr. Narayansingh Kashirasingh Hazari Vs. Sheikh Ismail s/o Sk. Imam and others) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.N. Kukday, Advocate for Appellant. [CAF No.1092/2014] Shri S.A. Marathe, Advocate for Respondent No.6.[CAF No.1092/2014] Shri S.G. Joshi, Advocate for Appellant. [FA No.613/2012] Shri D.N. Kukday, Advocate for Respondent No.3 [FA No.613/2012] Shri S.D. Dharaskar, Advocate for Respondent No.6 [FA No.613/2012] CORAM: DR. (SMT.) SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATE: 1 st AUGUST, 2017.

This is an application for condonation of delay in preferring the first appeal.

Learned counsel for respondent-claimant submits that he has no objection if the application for condonation of delay is allowed as connected First Appeal No.613/2012 is pending and is fixed for final hearing on 03.08.2017. In view thereof, this application for condonation of delay is allowed with no order as to costs. The appeal be registered.

caf1092.14.O.odt 2 Heard.

Admit.

As R & p is already received and private paper-book is filed in the counter appeal bearing No.613/2012, filing of private paper-book is dispensed with in this appeal. This will be heard along with First Appeal No.6313/2012.

Learned counsel for respondent No.6 submits that he has not received the copy of appeal memo, hence he is unable to proceed the hearing of the appeal. Shri Kukday, learned counsel for appellant submits that he will supply copy of appeal memo to learned counsel for respondent No.6 by tomorrow.

Considering that no liability as such is fixed by the Tribunal on respondent No.6, it is not necessary to adjourn the matter for long. Both these appeals be kept for final hearing on 03.08.2017.

JUDGE NSN