← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1589/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Dattakishor Jagannath Kumbhare v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary Tirbal Welfare Dept. Mumbai And Others

2015-10-19Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

WP3373-02 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3373/2002 (DATTA KISHOR JAGANNATH KUMBHARE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.D. Khati, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri N.R. Rode, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri S.N. Kumar, counsel for the R-3 & 4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 19 , 2015.

Shri Khati, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that since it appears that the petitioner was promoted on the basis of his caste claim and since the matters in regard to the protection of the promotion of the employees are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the writ petition may not be heard at this stage. It is stated that the petition could be heard as per its turn and the petitioner would not press Civil Application No.1589 of 2015.

In view of the aforesaid statement, Civil Application No.1589 of 2015 stands disposed of as not pressed. The writ petition may be placed for hearing as per its turn.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE