← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/561/2019dismissed as withdrawn

Shivlal Natthuji Virghat v. State Of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary Home Department Mantralaya Mumbai

2020-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

wp561.19 10

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.561/2019 Shivlal Natthuji Virghat ..vs..

State of Mah., thr. its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and anr ................................................................................................................................................................... OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri Mir Nagman Ali, Counsel for the Petitioner. Mrs.Nandita Dubey, Addl.P.P. for the State.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE & ANIL S.KILOR, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 24 , 2020 .

Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and learned counsel agreed that the Audio and Visual Quality were proper.

1.

This writ petition was filed by the petitioner for getting himself to be categorized in Category (2)(b) of 2010 Guidelines.

2.

The State has filed a reply and pointed out that the petitioner is categorized in Category 2(c) of the said Guidelines.

3.

Judgment in Sessions Trial No.53/2004, in which the petitioner is convicted for life imprisonment, is placed on record by the petitioner himself which shows that he set his wife ablaze after pouring kerosene due to which she died which stands proved during the Trial. .....2/-

wp561.19 10 4.

In this view of the matter, categorization of the petitioner in Category (2)(c) of 2010 Guidelines is perfectly correct.

5.

Hence, when the Court was about to dismiss the writ petition, learned counsel Shri Mir Nagman Ali for the petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the writ petition.

6.

The criminal writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-