Rahim S/O Rahamatulla Kureshi v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps Hingna, Nagpur

aba764.20.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.764 OF 2020 (Rahim s/o Rahamatulla Kureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PSO PS Hingna, Nagpur) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for Non-Applicant/State. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE: 19 th JANUARY, 2021.

The applicant is apprehending arrest in Crime 568/2020 registered with Police Station Hingna, Nagpur for offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 326 of Indian Penal Code.

2.

Noticing, that concerning the same incident there are cross-reports and Crime 569/2020 is registered against the rival group, and further noting the submission of the learned counsel Mr. Prakash Jaiswal that the applicant himself suffered injuries, this Court granted interim pre-arrest protection.

3.

It is not the case of the prosecution that the conditions imposed while granting interim pre-arrest protection are not complied with.

4.

I have perused the case diary. A case is made out

aba764.20.O.odt for making the interim pre-arrest protection absolute. 5.

The interim pre-arrest protection is made absolute with the only modification that the applicant shall, till the charge-sheet is filed, attend the concerned police station, as and when required by the Investigating Officer. JUDGE NSN