Naresh Raoji Pusam v. The Election Officer, Adiwasi Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Gewardha And Others

WP3988-18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3988/2018 (NARESH RAOJI PUSAM VERSUS THE ELECTION OFFICER, ADIWASI VIVIDHA KARYAKARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT, GEWARDHA, GADCHIROLI & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.A. Dhawas, counsel for petitioner.

Ms A.R. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for R-1.

Shri P.S. Tidke, counsel for R-2 & 3.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : JULY , 2019.

The challenge raised in the present writ petition is to the acceptance of the nomination form of the respondent no.3. It is informed that the elections have been held and the respondent no.3 stands elected.

Hence, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the election of the respondent no.3 by availing statutory remedy, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

The points raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE APTE