Samadhan Sadashiv Wankhade And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Revenue And Forest Department, Mumbai And 2 Others

1 cao1814.18....odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No.1814/2018 in M.C.A. St. No.14449/18 (Ramesh Suradkar & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra) & Civil Application (CAO) No.1815/2018 in M.C.A. St. No.14458/18 (Samadhan Wankhade & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra) & Civil Application (CAO) No.1816/2018 in M.C.A. St. No.14465/18 (Ujwala Ingale Vs. State of Maharashtra ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. O.Y. Kashid, Advocate for petitioners Smt. Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondents CORAM :MANISH PITALE, J.

DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2019 These are the applications seeking restoration of the writ petitions and for condonation of delay in moving the applications for restoration. 2.

It appears that the writ petitions stood dismissed due to failure on the part of the petitioners to remove office objections. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the office objections could not be removed within time due to the fact that the applicants are residing in remote places. 3.

Hence, for the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. Delay is condoned and the writ petitions are directed to be restored

2 cao1814.18....odt subject to the petitioners removing office objections within a period of two weeks from today.

4.

List these writ petitions on 13th December, 2019.

JUDGE MP Deshpande