Shri Gajanan S/O Madhukar Gawner v. Director Of Technical Education Mumbai And 4 Others

CP227-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.227/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4959/2013 (D) (GAJANAN MADHUKAR GAWNER VERSUS DR.SUBHASH MAHAJAN, DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioner.

Mrs. K.S. Joshi, Additional G.P. for the R-1 & 2. Shri A. Sambre, counsel for the R-3 & 4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 12 , 2018.

By this contempt petition, the petitioner has sought action against the respondents for willful disobedience of the directions in the order dated 27.10.2014.

The contempt petition was filed as according to the petitioner, the respondents had not decided the proposal of the petitioner for promotion in accordance with law though this Court had directed them to decide the same within a period of twelve weeks.

It is stated on behalf of the respondents that there was some delay in deciding the proposal of the petitioner but the same was not deliberate and intentional. It is submitted that the proposal of the petitioner is decided in terms of the order dated 11.09.2017 in Writ Petition No.1375 of 2017.

Since we find that the order of which the contempt is alleged stands complied with, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE