Rajesh S/O Natthuji Yadav @ Patel (In Jail) v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Midc, Nagpur

1/4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [BA] No.646 of 2016 (Rajesh s/o Natthuji Yadav @ Patel vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., Police Station M.I.D.C., Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Anil Mardikar, Sr. Advocate with Shri N.S. Deshpande, Adv. for the Applicant.

Shri H.D. Dubey, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 12 th AUGUST, 2016.

Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Perused the F.I.R. and the documents placed on record.

It is seen that so far as this applicant is concerned, there is no reasonable material available on record from which one can reach a prima facie conclusion about this applicant possessing knowledge as regards the previous transactions. The major part of the investigation is over. The applicant is in jail from 02/07/2016. The other co-accused has already been released on bail. The original owner has not been arraigned as accused person by the Investigating Officer. In this situation, I do not think

2/4 that any purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for any longer period of time. Hence, the order.

1. The application is allowed.

2. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one solvent surety in the like sum on the conditions that the applicant shall attend the concerned police station on every Sunday between 05:00 p.m. and 06:00 p.m. till the charge-sheet is filed, shall also regularly attend the dates fixed by the trial Court, shall cooperative with the trial Court in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

3. The application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE *sdw

3/4 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 12/08/2016 P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.

4/4