← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1920/2019admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Shalikgram S/O Pandharinath Thute v. Smt. Indutai Vishwanathji Thute And Others

2019-10-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale1 pages

1 / 1 cao1920.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) No. 1920 OF 2019 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION (St.) No. 14432 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL (St.) No. 3299 OF 2019 [Rejected No.353 of 2019] Shalikgram Pandharinath Thute vs.

Smt. Indutai Vishwasnathji Thute and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri. A. A. Choubey, counsel for applicant / appellant. CORAM : Manish Pitale J DATED : 09.10.2019 These are applications filed on behalf of the appellant seeking restoration appeal, which was dismissed on account of a conditional order passed by learned Registrar, as also an application for condonation of delay in moving the application for restoration.

2.

For the reasons stated in these applications, the same are allowed and consequently, the delay is condoned and the appeal is restored, subject to the appellant removing office objections within a period of two weeks from today.

JUDGE KOLHE