Chandrakant @ Pintu S/O Suresh Jaiswal v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Kanhan, Nagpur

ba.650.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [BA] No.650 of 2016 (Chandrakant @ Pintu s/o Suresh Jaiswal vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Kanhan, District Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Prafull Mohagaokar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S.S. Doifode, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 20 th OCTOBER, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The learned A.P.P. has pointed out the order passed by this Court on 02/05/2016 and submits that the applicant has not approached this Court with clean hands as he has not mentioned in the application that liberty to file a fresh application could be exercised by him only in the event that the trial did not commence within six months from 02/05/2016. He is right. While the order dated 02/05/2016 is generally mentioned, nothing is mentioned about it's liberty part. The period of six months is yet to be over. The application is, therefore, rejected as not maintainable.

*sdw JUDGE

ba.650.16 2 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 21/10/2016 P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.