Bombay High CourtWP/5588/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Nrusimha Saraswati Swamy Maharaj Sansthan,Washim,Thr.Prest.,Narayanrao Ganpatrao Khedkar And Anothe v. Shri. Shekhar Purushattamrao Kannav, And Others

2017-01-31Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5588/2015 Nrusimha Saraswati Swamy Maharaj Sansthan through its President and another ...Versus...

Shri Shekhar Purushattamrao Kannav and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Dhoble, Advocate for petitioners CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK , J.

DATE : 31.01.2017 Shri Dhoble, the learned Counsel for the petitioners states that since the petitioners had challenged the interlocutory order passed under Section 41 D of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act and since the substantive application under Section 41 D of the Act is decided during the pendency of the writ petition, the cause for filing the writ petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE Wadkar