Bahujan Hitay Shikshan Sanstha, Through Secretary Shri Sukhdeo S. Meshram v. Shri. Nand Kumar, The Secretary, Dept. Of Educdation And Sport, Mumbai, And Others

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3932 OF 2013 (D) Bahujan Hitay Shikshan Sanstha, Gadchiroli, thr. Secretary and others -vsShri Nand Kumar, The Secretary, Deptt. Of Education and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. Akash B. Moon, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. V.P. Maldhure, AGP for the respondents.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 29.08.2016.

By this contempt petition, the petitioners have sought action against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order, dated 20.02.2015 in Writ Petition No.3932 of 2013.

It is stated on behalf of the petitioners that though the respondents were directed by this Court to evaluate the proposal of the petitioners on the basis of the change in policy, the respondents had not decided the proposal.

Shri V. P. Maldhure, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, states by referring to the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 on 14.07.2016 that the proposal of the petitioners is decided by an order dated 05.03.2016 and the same is partly rejected. On a reading of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent No.2 on 14.07.2016 as also the Annexure-2-1 annexed thereto that the proposal of the petitioners is decided by the State Government on 05.03.2016. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners have other remedy, but the correctness or otherwise of the said order cannot be a matter for consideration in a contempt petition.

2/3 Since there is no reason for proceeding with the contempt petition any longer, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE

3/3 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order. Uploaded by : G.S.Khunte, Uploaded on : 30/08/2016 P.A.to Hon'ble Judge