Bombay High CourtWP/5040/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

The Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, Through Chief Executive Officer v. Ku. Kavita Ganpatrao Dangat

2017-02-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp5040.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5040 OF 2016 (ZILLA PARISHAD, GADCHIROLI...VS.. KU. KAVITA GANPATRAO DANGAT) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri H.A.Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioner.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 13, 2017.

The petitioner/ employer has challenged the interim order granted by the Industrial Court in favour of the employee staying the effect and operation of the transfer order dated 23rd May, 2016. The impugned order is passed on 20th June, 2016. In my view, it would not be appropriate to interfere with the interim order specially when it is operating for about 8 months.

The petition is dismissed. No costs.

At this stage, the learned advocate for the petitioner/ employer makes a grievance that because of the impugned order the employer will not be able to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer in April-May, 2017. The petitioner - employer is at liberty to file appropriate application before the Industrial Court pointing out its difficulty / grievance in the matter. If such application is filed, the Industrial Court shall decide the application according to law.

JUDGE RRaut..