← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/920/2024ca disposed off

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Thr. The Executive Engineer, Wardha Project Div., Wardh v. Shri. Narayan S/O Tukaram Ghuratkar And Others

2024-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Anandrao Deshmukh3 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:8601

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 920 OF 2024 IN MISC. APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 14092 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2020 (D) VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WARDHA PROJECT DIV., WARDH -Vs. - SHRI. NARAYAN S/O TUKARAM GHURATKAR AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri T.M. Zaheer, Advocate for appellants.

Shri C.R.Najbile, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Ms. D.I.Charlewar, AGP for respondent nos. 2 and 3/State. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH , J.

DATED : 02/08/ The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 480 days caused in preferring the application for restoration of appeal.

Issue notice to the respondents.

Shri C.R.Najbile, learned Advocate waives notice for respondent no. 1.

Ms. D.I.Charlewar, learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos. 2 and 3/State.

5.

Perused the application.

6.

Heard learned Advocates for the both sides.

7.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed. Delay in preferring the application for restoration of appeal is hereby condoned. 8.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. MISC. APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 14092 OF 2024 This is an application for restoration of appeal which was dismissed for non-filing of paper book.

Issue notice to the respondents.

Shri C.R.Najbile, learned Advocate waives notice for respondent no. 1.

Ms. D.I.Charlewar, learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos. 2 and 3/State.

5.

Perused the application.

6.

Heard learned Advocates for the both sides.

7.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as prayed for. As such, the application is allowed. 8.

Registry is directed to register the appeal to its file. 9.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. FIRST APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2020 The learned Advocates for the appellant and the respondents submit that it is not necessary to file paper book and the appeal can be decided on the basis of R & P.

Considering this fact, the filing of paper book is dispensed with.

Call R & P.

Stand over after seeks weeks.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) B.T. Khapekar