Bombay High CourtWP/4927/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Sudhir S/O. Gulabrao Chafale v. Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, And Others

2016-04-02Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik1 pages

WP4927-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4927/2015 (SUDHIR GULABRAO CHAFALE VERSUS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI & ORS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.V. Muley, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri A.K. Bangadkar, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 4. Shri R.D. Tajne, counsel for the R-5.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK, J.

DATE : APRIL 2 , 2016.

By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order of the Additional Commissioner, Amravati granting ad-interim relief in favour of the respondent no.5, without hearing the petitioner though a caveat was filed in the matter.

Shri Muley, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that after the impugned order dated 16.07.2015 was passed, this Court had permitted the Additional Commissioner to pass appropriate orders on the stay application as also on the appeal filed by the respondent no.5. It is stated that during the pendency of the writ petition, the Additional Commissioner, Amravati has heard the appeal and the appeal is closed for orders. In view of the aforesaid statement, since no interim relief is operating in favour of the petitioner since the filing of the petition on 12.08.2015, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati to decide the appeal filed by the respondent no.5 as early as possible and positively within a period of one month. Order accordingly, no costs.

JUDGE APTE