M/S. Mics, Wardha A Proprietary Concern, Amit S/O Devidas Kadwe v. Dr. P. Anbalgan, Chief Executive Officer, Maha. Industrial

2023:BHC-NAG:13466-DB

18. WP 705 of 2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.705/2022 M/s. MICS, a proprietary concern Amit S/o Devidas Kadwe ...Versus...

Hon'ble Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Mining & Marathi Language Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032 and others WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.212/2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.705/2022 M/s. MICS, a proprietary concern Amit S/o Devidas Kadwe ...Versus...

Dr. P. Anbalgan, Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. H.R. Gadhia, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. K.S. Joshi, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 Mr. S.K. Mishra, Sr. Advocate a/b Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 5 Mr. M.G. Bhangde, Sr. Advocate a/b Mr. S. Sarda, Advocate for respondent no.6 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ.

DATE : 11/09/2023 1.

In view of the affidavit filed by the respondent nos.2 to 5 stating that the allotment of the plot in question shall be made by public auction, Mr. H.R. Gadhia, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance raised by the petitioner in this

18. WP 705 of 2022.odt petition stands redressed.

2.

In view of the above statements, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.212/2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.

705/2022 1.

In view of the dismissal of writ petition as infructuous, the notices issued on contempt petition stand discharged.

2.

The contempt proceedings are dropped. No order as to costs.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar