Vilas S/O Babanrao Pardakhe v. Maha. State Road Transport Corp. Thr. Divisional Controller, Yavatmal And Another

1 wp4703.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4703 OF 2017 (VILAS BABANRAO PARDAKHE....VS.. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C.V.Jagdale, Advocate for Petitioner.

Ms Bhagyasri Reddy, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2018.

Heard.

The petitioner has filed complaint before the Labour Court and in that complaint an application under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 was filed, praying for interim relief. This application was dismissed by the Labour Court by order dated 5th January, 2017. Against this order the petitioner /employee had filed revision before the Industrial Court. This revision is dismissed by the impugned order.

After going through the impugned orders, I find that the subordinate Courts have considered all the relevant aspects. I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order.

The petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE RRaut..