← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/2013/2019delay condonatedrejected

Umrao @ Umesh S/O Krishnaji Walke v. Mrs. Jyoti W/O Umrao Walke

2021-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala2 pages

5CAO 2013.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 2013 OF 2019 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 14785 OF 2019 (Umrao @ Umesh s/o Kisanji Walke, Nagpur Vs. Mrs. Jyoti w/o Umrao Walke, Nagpur) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri R.P. Waghmare, Advocate for the applicant/ appellant..

Shri Bhushan Dafle, Advocate for the respondent. .....

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

SEPTEMBER 09, 2021.

Heard.

2.

This is an application for condonation of 40 days delay caused in filing the Appeal, which is being filed against the judgment and decree dated 03/04/2019 passed by the Family Court No.4, Nagpur in Petition No. A-1006/2015.

3.

Shri Dafle, learned counsel for the respondent/ wife, opposed the application for want of sufficient reasons.

4.

We have perused the contents in the application. The reasons for causing the aforesaid delay in filing the Appeal are mentioned in para 2 and 3 of the application.

5CAO 2013.2019 5.

On due consideration, we are satisfied that the aforesaid delay caused in filing the Appeal is satisfactorily explained.

6.

Accordingly, the application is allowed.

Delay of 40 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered.

FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.............../2021.

7.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable after four weeks.

8.

Shri Dafle, learned counsel, waives service of notice for the respondent.

(JUDGE) (JUDGE) Sumit