Sudhakar S/O Padmakar Mirchapure v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Amravati And Others

9-caf-240-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 240 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 13457 OF 2020 Sudhakar Mirchapure Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. N.S. Bhelkar, Advocate for the applicant Ms. Shamsi Haider, AGP for the non-applicants No.1 and 2 Mrs. Ira Khisti, Advocate for the non-applicant No.3 CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE :

4th DECEMBER, 2021.

Heard Shri Bhelkar, learned counsel for the applicant on this application for condonation of delay. Notices on this application were issued. In pursuance to the said, non-applicants are appeared. Ms. Shamsi Haider, learned AGP is appearing for the non-applicants No.1 and 2 and Ms. Ira Khisti, learned counsel is appearing for the non-applicant No.3. No reply is filed on behalf of any of the non-applicants.

2.

After having gone through the contents of the application, I am satisfied that the claimant, who intends to file the appeal for enhancement of compensation has satisfactorily explained the delay. Resultantly, I pass the following order.

ORDER

i.

The application is allowed.

ii.

The delay is condoned.

9-caf-240-2021.odt 3.

However, it is made clear that if in case the appeal of the appellant is allowed finally, the appellant will not be entitled to claim interest of the delay period. 4.

Office is directed to register the appeal.

5.

Application is disposed of.

JUDGE MP Deshpande P DESHPANDE 13:28