Suhas S/O Chintamanrao Moholkar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Higher And Technical Education And Others

caw2576.14 1/2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLN. (W) NOS.2388 & 2576 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETN. NO.2429 OF 2014 Suhas S/o Chintamanrao Moholkar -vsThe State of Maharashtra and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ms T.D.Khade, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.D.P.Thakre, Addl.G.P.for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.Sambre, counsel for the applicant-respondent No.4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 27.03.2015.

CIVIL APPLN. (W) NOS.2388 OF 2014 Mrs.Khade, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause for filing the civil application has been rendered infructuous.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the civil application stands disposed of.

The points raised in the application are kept open.

CIVIL APPLN. (W) NO.2576 OF 2014 Heard.

It appears that though an ad interim order was granted in favour of the petitioner-non-applicant, a statement was made by the learned counsel for the petitioner-non-

caw2576.14 2/2 applicant that no coercive steps would be taken by the petitioner to seek the implementation of the ad interim order. Since the said statement is made from time to time, there is no reason to decide this application.

In view of the aforesaid, the civil application stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE