Shri. Arvind S/O. Vasantrao Thakre (In Jail) v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ramnagar Police Station Chandrapur Dist. Chandrapur
1 ba674.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION (BA) NO. 674 OF 2017 (ARVIND VASANTRAO THAKRE....VS.. STATE OF MAH.THR.P.S.O., RAMNAGAR, CHANDRAPUR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.V.Sirpurkar, Advocate for Applicant.
Shri Neeraj Patil, A.P.P. for Non-applicant.
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATED : JULY 24, 2017.
Heard.
The applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No.281 of 2017, registered against him and two others for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a) and 83 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act.
According to the Investigating Agency, on getting information Police Party stopped the vehicle (Chevrolet Beat) when it was proceeding from Warora to Chandrapur and on search liquor worth Rs.6,60,000/- is seized from the vehicle. According to the Investigating Agency, co-accused Ankit Vispute and Pawan Gourkar who were in the vehicle were arrested and during interrogation they revealed that the liquor was purchased from the shop of wife of the applicant. According to the Investigating Agency, the applicant is managing the business on the basis of Noukarnama and is making available the liquor for being sold in Chandrapur district where sale of liquor is prohibited.
2 ba674.17 The application is opposed on the ground that earlier also two crimes for similar offences are registered against the applicant.
The investigation is complete and charge-sheet is filed on 10th July, 2017. The non-applicant has not been able to point out that further custody of the applicant is required for investigation.
In the facts of the case, following order is passed: The applicant having been arrested in connection with Crime No.281 of 2017, registered by the non-applicant, he be released on bail on furnishing cash security of Rs.One Lakh and furnishing one solvent surety in the like amount. The application is allowed accordingly.
JUDGE RRaut..