Sanjay Manohar Pardhi v. Veena Wd/O Laxman Agrawal (Tajpuriya) And Others

2023:BHC-NAG:15866 1 40.caf.3309.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3309/2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13731/2022 Sanjay Manohar Pardhi Vs. Veena Wd/o. Laxman Agrawal and Ors. ................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. V. R. Deshpande, Advocate for Appellant.

Mr. Harsh Kinjvani, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM :

MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATED :

30.10.2023 CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3309/2023 .

The appellant is the owner of the vehicle. The liability to pay 50% decretal amount is saddled on this appellant.

2.

Insurance Company has already challenged the order passed by the Tribunal and Company has already deposited the entire decretal amount.

3.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 117 days is condoned. 4.

The application is disposed of.

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13731/2022 .

The appeal out of same award filed by the Insurance Company is already admitted.

2.

Stand over after Diwali Vacation.

3.

Tag this appeal with First Appeal No.344/2021. (MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule