← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/796/2021rule absolute

Sunil Vishnu Mukne v. State Of Mah. Thr. Superintendent Of Jail Central Jail Amravati And 2 Others

2021-12-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala2 pages

crwp796.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.796 OF 2021 Shri Sunil Vishnu Mukne, Aged about 30 years, R/o At Post Kolad Adiwashiwadi, Post : Kolad, Tah. Roha, Dist. Raigad, (C-5337 - Presently at Central Prison Amravati) ...PETITIONER ...V E R S U S...

1.State of Maharashtra, Through Superintendent of Jail, Central Jail, Amravati.

2.Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Armavati.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Eastern Region, Nagpur.

...RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Raju Kadu, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, A.P.P. for respondents.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- M.S. SONAK AND PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ .

DATE :- 23 rd DECEMBER, ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER: M.S. SONAK , J.

) Rule. Rule is returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the sides.

2.

For the reasons which we have set out in our judgment and order dated 21.12.2021 disposing of Criminal Writ Petition No.800 of 2021 (Dilip s/o Vishnu Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and others), we set aside the impugned order dated 04.06.2021 made in the present case and remand the

crwp796.21.odt matter to the concerned authority (respondent no.1) for fresh consideration of application of the petitioner in accordance with law and in the light of observations that we have made in our judgment and order dated 21.12.2021 disposing of Criminal Writ Petition No.800 of 2021.

3.

The petitioner'

s application will have to be decided expeditiously and in any case within two weeks from the date of communication of this order. Further, we make it clear that the petitioner's application will have to be decided based on the situation prevailing on the date of which the said application was made.

The Rule is made absolute. There shall be no order for costs.

(Pushpa V. Ganediwala, J.) (M.S. Sonak, J.) Wagh Signed By:SURESH RAOSAHEB WAGH Personal Assistant to the Hon'ble Judge